Contact Report Details | TEST Data Online | Oregon Drinking Water Services

More information for this water system: SDWIS ID 3603
System Info :: Report for Lenders :: Alerts :: Violations :: Compliance & Enforcement :: Contacts & Advisories :: Site Visits :: Public Notice
Coliform Summary :: Coliform Results :: Coliform Schedules :: LT2 :: GW/GWUDI Source Details :: Plan Review :: Annual Fee
Chemical Summary :: Chemical Results :: Chemical Schedules :: Chemical Schedule Summary :: Arsenic RAA :: Cyanotoxins :: PFAS
Lead & Copper :: DBP Sample Sites :: FANLs :: MRDL :: GWR 4-Log :: Turbidity :: SWTR :: LRAA :: DW Source Protection

Information for all water systems:
Water System Inventory :: Water System Surveys :: Outstanding Performers :: Treatment Plant Inspections :: Treatment :: Plan Reviews
Alerts :: Violations :: Compliance & Enforcement :: Deficiencies :: System Scores :: Exceedances :: Public Notices :: Service Lines
Water Advisories :: Contact Reports :: Cyanotoxins :: PFAS :: Post-wildfire VOCs :: Fluoride :: Certification List :: DW Source Protection

Introduction :: Data Search Options :: Water System Search :: DWS Home :: DWS Rules

Need help? Email Drinking Water Services for assistance.Staff/Partner Login

OHA Drinking Water Services Contact Report Details
PWS ID:	OR41 01279
PWS Name:	HWY 58 TRAILER PARK

Who Was Contacted and Phone:	Walter Zajac (541) 937-2426
Contact Date:	08/13/2010
Contacted By:	KALISH, FRED (REGION 2)
Contact Method/Location:	Office

Assistance Type:	OTHER REGULATORY - REGULATORY ASSISTANCE
Reasons:	Arsenic Operations

Details:	SUMMARY: Plan Review for As Treatment DETAILS: Spoke with Mr. Zajac this morning regarding his intentions with respect to arsenic treatment at his facility. Mr. Zajac indicated that he had previously contracted for the installation of a centralized As treatment system in 2006 (Culligan w/ResinTech media) that failed. Based on recommendations from Culligan, the media was replaced in early 2010 by Culligan with Adedge Bayoxide media (w/o plan review) which also failed to perform. He is now planning to have Culligan install POU As treatment devices. I explained to Mr. Zajac that the State requires plan review and submittal prior to installation. Mr. Zajac explained that he could not understand the regulations and that they also changed which made it that much more confusing. I explained to him the plan review requirements and followed up with an email to him, Katrinka Danielson (Lane County), Dave Love (Culligan) and Casey Lyon. The POU device review can be managed under the active plan review number (18-2010) initiated to deal with second centralized As treatment (which was never approved by DWP). He will need to submit a $45 PR fee with the POU Plan Review Submittal. ACTION NEEDED: Wait for submittal.